|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeWild Bird SuppliesBinocularsBushnell H2O 10x26 Waterproof/Fogproof Compact Binocular |
|
|  |
| Customer Reviews: | | Average Customer Review: ( 9 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 found the following review helpful:
 small but powerful Jul 06, 2010
By J. Weber
These ARE small! Which is what I like about them, weighing one pound and being only 4 x 5" they are so easy to take with I enjoy using them. The optics are very good. Not as good as our much more expensive Bushnells, but these get used a bit more as they are so convenient to take along on the kayak or on a trip. One caveat - these work well for me as I have a smaller face, but they are too small for my husband, who has a larger face and his eyes are farther apart. So if that description fits you too, try another pair of Bushnells.
8 of 8 found the following review helpful:
Twas blind but now I see Jan 21, 2010
By Lafoxa
Such crisp, clear images! So easy to use & they're comfortable in my hand - I'm an avid bird watcher & the Bushnell H2O 10x26 binoculars make viewing my winged friends so much more enjoyable than the old, bulky pair I had been using - now I see what I was missing in breathtaking detail which helps to identify even the littlest birds - and I can't wait to take them to a concert as they fit perfectly in a coat pocket or handbag
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
good purchase Jul 01, 2011
By Daniel
I bought these as a gift for my father to take on a cruise to Alaska. Since we were traveling, I needed light weight as well as clarity of vision. These fit the bill. My dad enjoyed them and they were convenient to carry around.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
 just adequate Jul 29, 2011
By soccer dad
They are okay but need better cups for the eye. Basically you get what you pay for. Compact, easy to carry but just so-so for image quality and ease of use.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
 Two strikes.... Jun 22, 2011
By Skaphandrus
Look great on paper, but the optics on the first one I received were misaligned, giving a double image that would not converge. Assuming that was a fluke, I exchanged the item. On the second one, the plastic piece housing the axial rod around which the oculars rotate when changing interpupillary distance was split down the middle, rendering this one useless as well. Perhaps I would have had better luck with a third unit, but clearly there are some major problems in manufacturing and quality control.
See all 9 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
